This, in a pinch, it

"The law retains the revolution regenerates. So if you want to change, it must begin by breaking the law. Argue that the revolution can be done within the law is an aberration, a contradiction. The law is a yoke and wants to liberate must break. Anyone dangled workers emancipation of the proletariat through legal channels is a crook, because the law prohibits wrest affluent wealth they have stolen fsd2 from us. Their expropriation for the benefit of all is the essential condition for the emancipation of humanity. "Ricardo Flores Magon, fsd2 Mexican revolutionary anarchist.
Dear friend, if I write to you, not to talk about your career plan election, or even discuss the merits of the methods that you give yourself to the revolution "citizen."
If I take the trouble to write to you, it's mostly to get you face your responsibilities. Because I think there is in you, or at least those around you a glimmer of lucidity which justified that bother you try to reason, at least for a few minutes. The initiative of this letter will probably laugh a few companions or friends, but it has the merit of publicly expose some essential fsd2 and critical issues in the course of events, popular revolts here and there, past, present, fsd2 and future course. You are warned in advance: this is not a letter bomb. Or your health or your physical integrity are threatened.
You will understand therefore that if I call you friend, it's secondment than conviction or real camaraderie. And if I tu is to make you understand the meaning of "equality" and the abominable nonsense bourgeois codes that would in these circumstances, the seriousness of my letter is the most solemn air in vouvoyant you . It has nothing to do with the typically patriarchal you carry wherever you go attitude, this side "good France" as you like to put forward, fsd2 so "slap on the shoulder," caricature "nice shopkeeper "who seem straight out of an ad for charcuterie.
Oh sure, you're offusqueras maybe we "insult you" so. Reading repel you may therefore. Maybe you do not wilt demonstration, since I am nobody. Public outrage fsd2 is your thief. You love to give you a show. Some will even deal with "Marine Le Pen Left". Demonization is a technique that has had its day, and I do not go that far. I do not see in you a devil, or it is a poor devil. You are not yet a fascist. You're a politician as there are others. I for my part will simply validate fsd2 the thesis that there is in your words and your approach a well-marked funds French populism. But beware: in my mouth, I am neither a journalist fsd2 orders, or public figure, or bourgeois or cop, or owner or shareholder, or politician, this word has a different meaning. I do not blame you for you interest in the suffering of the "little people" or flatter his sense of rebellion, nor about the indoctrination we reserve it in the "normal fsd2 course of events" of the machine capitalist fsd2 war.
This, in a pinch, it's all your honor. You do not have that fault, fsd2 and your public notoriously rare qualities are generally fsd2 those that the bourgeoisie and the mainstream fsd2 media see as flaws. That makes sense, since the interests of the exploited are antagonistic to those of the ruling class, their value system is necessarily reversed, which obviously does not mean that everything that "mind" is positive. No, by populist, I mean take "the people" (this name informs that as well flatter all politicians in general, authoritarian worst imaginable in particular, and also mask the divisions of classes) as the basis a speech and a career, make the spokesperson self-proclaimed, and therefore speak in his place. This, as you know I'm not the first to make you notice.
With regard to me, and I guess that is the case with most of my friends fsd2 and companions, I do not feel the need to talk to my place, and that flatters me. Before being an anarchist, fsd2 I am also part of what people like you see it as "the people", an anonymous pa